Skip to main content

MULTIPLIER - Simple Economics for our life ✅



MULTIPLIER:-


It is number of times increase in value of something.

Then, what is money multiplier?
Yes. You’re right. It is the number of times increase in value  of  money. If you have
100 in your pocket, how much value does it going to create? The obvious answer will be 100 but its incorrect, certainly more than that.

The answer depends on how much you are going to spend.


Suppose you are given a pocket money of 100. You have decided to spend 75 and save 25 for future use.

With
75 in your pocket, you are going to a Icecream shop. Once you reach there, you are buying a  Butterscotch icecream worth 75. When you exchange something in turn of money or monetary value, It is called  as a transaction. In this transaction, you have spent 75 for a icecream (expenditure)  and the shopkeeper earned 75(income).

Then the shopkeeper goes to a stationery shop and buys a classmate note costing
56 for his child(expenditure ). The stationery shop keeper(income) gives him a classmate note in exchange for 56. After that the stationery shop owner would spend money on something and the process will go on expenditure becomes 0. 

Therefore,  one man's expenditure is other man's  income.  

Let's put it in a table:
ROUND
Expenditure
Aggregate Expenditure
1
100
100
2
75
175
3
56.25
231.25
4
42.18
273.43
5
31.63
305.06
6
17.79
328.78
7
13.34
346.57
8
10.00
359.91
9
7.50
369.91
10
5.62
377.41
11
4.21
383.03
12
3.15
387.24
13
2.36
390.39
14
1.77
392.75
15
1.32
394.52
16
0.99
395.84
17
0.74
396.83
18
0.55
397.57
19
0.41
398.12
20
0.30
398.53
21
0.22
398.83
22
0.16
399.05
23
0.12
399.21
24
0.09
399.33
25
0.07
399.42
26
0.05
399.49
27
0.03
399.54
28
0.02
399.57
29
0.01
399.59
30
0.01
399.6
Here we have assumed that people will spend 75% of their income earned on consumption activities such as buying food,  buying clothes, paying school/college fee, spending on movies etc. 
In Round 1,  person 1 spends 100 on his consumption activity and person 2 earns a income of 75
(75/100×100) 
In round 2,  person 2 spends 56(75/100 ×75) and person 3 earns a income of 56. and so on.

Now if you add all the items in 'cumulative increase in expenditure',  you will get a value higher than the initial
100. when you divide change in income(Y)  by change in expenditure(E). you will get the multiplier value. 

In this case,  
      
Multiplier=🔼Y   = 100-75    25   
                      🔼E      75-56.25   6.25
                   
               = 4 times.


It means when you spend
100,  it generates 400.


A real time example  can be NREGA in Gujarat,  the multiplier is as high as 4 i.e,  when you put
100,  it would generate 400. This is positive multiplier effect.

Imagine a  situation,  where the demand is less. What will the Icecream seller do if people like you didn't buy icrecreams. He will demand less Icecreams from the icrecream producer.  The icecream producer will produce less icecreams and he will reduce costs by laying off few of his labors.  The labors will be unemployed.  They will look for employment opportunities but at time they will realise that there are lots of people looking for job because change in one sector drastically affected the whole economy. In this case,  there will be lot of unemployed people but the national income will be still growing. This is negative multiplier effect.




So_Spend more_live happily!








Popular posts from this blog

The linguistic affinities and divergences between the phonetic systems of Korean and Dravidian languages

T  his article delves into the linguistic affinities and divergences between the phonetic systems of Korean and Dravidian languages, drawing insights from Chapter 1 of "A Comparative Grammar Of The Korean Language and the Dravidian Languages of India" by Homer B. Hulbert. In this seminal work, Hulbert explores the intricate parallels and distinctions that exist between these two language families, shedding light on their historical connections and typological characteristics. By examining phonemic contrasts, phonotactic patterns, and other phonological features, Hulbert offers a comprehensive analysis that enriches our understanding of linguistic diversity and evolution. Through this exploration, we aim to uncover the shared linguistic heritage and unique traits that define both Korean and Dravidian languages, contributing to a deeper appreciation of their rich cultural and linguistic significance.  fig.1: Similarities between Tamil ( தமிழ் ) and Korean ( 한글 ), the word ...

Null hypothesis Vs. Alternative hypothesis

  Null hypothesis Vs. Alternative hypothesis A hypothesis is a claim or statement about a population parameter. Usually, the results of a sample are applied to generalize on an entire population(s). For example, in a class of 30 students, 12 students are sampled for their test scores. The result is that the average score is 83. This result would, however, vary with another sample. A hypothesis can be a null hypothesis or an alternative hypothesis. A null hypothesis is a statement what the majority holds to be true. The opposite or complement of a null hypothesis is an alternative hypothesis. Let us understand a problem: A light bulb manufacturer claims that the average life of their light bulb is 1000 hours. A worker believes it is not 1000 hours. He tests the claim by taking a sample of 500 bulbs. A null hypothesis (Ho) is an accepted truth and assumes that the alternative claim is false. An alternative hypothesis(H1) is what the researcher is trying to prove. In this problem, the...

BIOLOGICAL ANNIHILATION _6TH MASS EXTINCTION_2100 NO EARTH ✅

During the past 500 million years, there were five "mass extinctions". This was a  study by Gerardo Paul Ehrlich and Rodolfo.  The big five mass extinctions Late Devonian, 375 million years before - 75% of species lost. End Permian, 251 million years before - 96% of species lost. End Triassic, 200 million years before - 80% of species lost. End Cretaceous, 66 million years before - 76% of all species lost.  Scientists say we've entered a sixth mass extinction.  According to a  new study , humans are the primary cause. Earth is on the verge of sixth mass extinction.  Scientists warn that the "6th mass extinction" of wildlife is more severe than perceived. Scientists had analyzed both common and rare species of animals world. The Earth’s sixth mass extinction is more severe than thought. It would appear by just counting lost or surviving species. The population of all species is in decline. Their only natural habitat is decreasing worse. ...